Thursday, September 18, 2008

Psychology - What makes people vote Republican or Democrat?

In my pursuit to figure out what makes people vote Republican, I came across this article by JONATHAN HAIDT, an Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of Virginia. It's kind of long winded, but it does give somewhat of a reason as to people's thinking. I've asked many people why they vote the way they do, but haven't gotten a lot of good reasons. So, my pursuit to the answer has taken me to researching it on the Internet.

On the same site as this essay, I also found a responsive article by various other sources with their opinions on the essay, which I found very interesting.

Here's another opinion of the essay from the blog labeled "Confessions of a Cooperator".

I also found an article titled "The Conservative Case for Voting Democratic" by Doug Bandow from the CATO Institute.

The biggest problem that I have found within the media is it is hard to find a completely neutral source. The idea of Republican or Democrat, based on past definitions, though, has completely changed. Both sides of the spectrum have changed, at least maybe somewhat, from their past ideologies.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Answers.com, the definition of a Democrat is:
    1. An advocate of democracy.
    2. One who believes in social equality or discounts distinctions in rank.
Philosophy Dictionary: democracy (Greek, rule by the people) In Greek thought, rule by the citizens in general (nevertheless excluding women and of course slaves) in contrast to government by the rich and aristocratic. In modern society the sovereignty of the people in general, expressed not directly by a vote on individual questions, but through representatives. Questions arise whether various mechanisms ensure that decision-making authentically answers to the people, or serves their interest (see also general will). The problem of delimiting a democratic constitution encounters these and other difficulties; critics suggest that political democracy is hollow unless accompanied by power in other spheres, and especially the area of economics.

From Answers.com, the definition of a Republican is:

  1. a. One who favors a republic as the best form of government.
Philosophy Dictionary: republicanism An ideal of government that emphasizes the role of the active, participating citizen in government, often looking back to the role of the citizen in ancient Rome or Athens. Institutionally it aims at checks and balances to prevent the emergence of faction and majority tyranny, but also to the town-hall politics whereby decision-making has a bottom-up rather than a top-down structure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With the definitions in mind, the current U.S. government has a lot of corruption and greed and the people's representatives (most politicians) have completely forgotten about the people. The best chance we have is to find the lesser of two evils. Even back in the ancient Roman times, corruption was a very big problem. It is easy to understand how the corruption happens, but why is it allowed? Our government was built upon checks and balances, but most of the checks and balances don't necessarily seem to be worked. I won't say all of them aren't working, otherwise we would have complete anarchy.

I pray, regardless of how I personally vote, that whomever takes office will pleasantly surprise me and do the right thing by remembering about the people they're serving, restoring the checks and balances, pursuing equality and justice for all, fixing our economy and helping to provide jobs for everyone, fighting for health care for all of the citizens, performing peaceful diplomatic relations with other countries, promoting and pursuing alternative and renewable forms of energy and breaking our dependence on foreign oil and fossil fuels in general, and pushing for the people to work as a United States of America!

2 comments:

T said...

Great points K and good philosophy, however the Dems of old i.e. Kennedy Johnson,Truman are not like the newer Dems. Just like the old Republicans are nothing like the old ones, it seems to me that they swing to far to the left or right for my tastes. I am not to crazy about either of these guys. Both candidates have good points and both in my own narrow opinion have their shortcomings. I am new to this political game. I like smaller government. I am still undecided at this point.

Ken said...

Hey T,

I understand where you're coming from, as both sides are quite a bit different than they used to be. With that aside, the key is to find who answers the questions, has the closest views to your own, is down to earth and personable and understands the common man's burdens, is diplomatic, is economical, is intelligent and grounded, is willing to defend his/her country, but doing so in a precise and calculated method (not hot-headed), and in doing so won't forget about the troops who gave life and limb for the cause....I could go on. Basically, at the present, I'm saying figure out who the lesser of two evils is and go with it.

I don't know if you've watched the last two debates, which I've only had time to give my review on the first, but watch EVERYTHING from both candidates. Over the last two, McCain has NOT once even looked at Obama, which I think is a bad sign of character. In my opinion, Obama has directly answered the most questions, with the least amount of spin. He actually answered how he would solve our current problems.

To be honest, I don't want to hear, "I have a LOT of experience" and blah, blah, blah. I want to hear the "Plan" on resolving the problems. I just can't take faith in a candidate who follows just about all of the same ideals as the current administration and expects the people of this nation to just sit idle and let the future administration do the worst it can, steadily like what has been done over the last eight years. Our country is in horrible shape and we need someone who is up for the challenge and can think outside of the current "box". We need help from our allies and need to rejuvenate those alliances. We may be the "best" country in the world, but for what, helping out other countries and forgetting all about the one we live in and the people who live in it?

With all of that said, who in your opinion, represents those ideals the most?